Supreme Court's Judgment on Sexual Harassment at Workplace

Bookmark and Share
After years of struggle , The Supreme Court of India has passed a judgmnent in the Medha Kotwal Lele case of sexual harrasment at workplace.

The Court in the order says " Lip service, hollow statements and  inert
and inadequate laws with sloppy enforcement are  not  enough  for  true  and
genuine upliftment of our half most precious population – the women." also directing the Bar Council of India , Medical Council of  India,   Council  of
Architecture, Institute  of  Chartered  Accountants,  Institute  of  Company
Secretaries  and  other  statutory  Institutes   shall   ensure   that   the
organisations,    bodies,    associations,    institutions    and    persons
registered/affiliated to follow the guidelines laid down by  Vishaka.

Read the full order here

Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit

Juveniles being forced into crime

Bookmark and Share
The Delhi high court on Wednesday issued notice to the city police and the department of women and child development on a PIL alleging that a large number of underpriviledged juveniles were being forced to take up crime by organised gangs.
Seeking a direction to the authorities to protect children from being pushed into the world of crime, the PIL said the earlier order to the Delhi police to act against adult criminals, accused of pushing children into crime, has not been complied with.
Taking note of the petition filed by an NGO, a bench of Acting Chief Justice A.K. Sikri and Justice R.S. Endlaw asked the Delhi police to file a status report indicating the steps taken by it to implement the order of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB), which had on January 25 last year asked the police to probe and act against adult offenders for using children in offences like theft.
The Juvenile Justice Board, taking note of an organised gang called “Thak-Thak” (knock-knock) gang, had asked the Delhi police to take action against the adult criminals for using children.
Lawyer Anant Asthana, appearing for the NGO Society of Values and Ethics in Education, submitted in the court, “The state and its instrumentalities should come forward with full might and determination to protect children who are being trapped into this circle of crime by adults due to their vulnerability, helplessness and tender age. This situation has been prevailing in Delhi for quite a long time now while the respondent (Delhi police) have been dealing with this problem in a casual manner not realising the gravity involved and not realising the urgency with which duty holders need to respond to this challenge,” the PIL said.

Read the article 30th August Asian Age

Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit

Delhi High Court calls for report from Delhi Police on kidnapping and abduction of young boys and girls in past five years

Bookmark and Share


Google Images
18.07.12/ New Delhi
Hearing a petition of a father claiming police inaction on kidnapping of his child, Delhi High Court has issued notice to Delhi Police and has called a detailed report on cases of kidnapping/ abduction of young boys and girls in that area in past five years detailing steps taken by Police and cases solved.
Arguing counsel Svetlana Sandra Correya from HRLN, who had filed the petition (Writ Petition Criminal 978 of 2012) informed the Court about growing number of kidnapping and abduction of young boys and girls in some areas of Delhi and urged for stringent measures to be adopted by the Police.
Delhi Police is expected to file its report within 10 days and matter will further be heard by Hon’ble Court on 08.08.2012.
HRLN had initiated this petition on being approached by a father whose young son had gone missing suddenly when he was playing out side his house and Police was not able to trace the child despite lapse of a considerable time. It was also brought to the notice of HRLN that there were numerous instances of children going missing being reported in that area.
Click here to read the order dated 18.07.2012.

For further details, please contact:
Advocate Svetlana Sandra Correya
Human Rights Law Network
Mob: 0 99 53 67 13 06
Email: litigation.delhi@hrln.org

Read Court Orders here 

Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit

Don't treat humans like guinea pigs, warns Supreme Court

Bookmark and Share
Source: NDTV
New Delhi: The Supreme Court today expressed concern over alleged illegal clinical trial of drugs in the country, saying its "unfortunate" that humans were being treated as "guinea pigs".

A bench headed by Justice RM Lodha pulled up the Centre and the Madhya Pradesh government for not filing their response on PILs alleging large-scale illegal drug trials in the state and other parts of the country.

The bench said, "There has to be some sense of responsibility (on the part of the government). Human beings are being treated as guinea pigs. This is unfortunate." The bench granted the government and Medical Council of India eight weeks more time to file their replies.

The court was hearing two PILs filed by a group of doctors and an NGO alleging that illegal and unethical clinical trials were being done on poor persons including juveniles, tribals and dalits who were used as guinea pigs for testing of drugs and vaccines produced by multinational corporations.

The petitioners had also urged the court to order formation a Committee of Experts, consisting of members of civil society especially, the All India Drug Action Network, to examine the present legal provisions concerning clinical trials both in India and abroad and to make recommendations for framing guidelines on the issue.


Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit

Khalra Centre for Human Rights Defenders

Bookmark and Share
Human Rights Law Network is proud to announce the website of Khalra Centre for Human Rights Defenders.

This website will give you latest updates on the human right defenders in India.

Kindly see the  website
and Facebook Page

Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit

HRLN team locked inside Asha Kiran while conducting inspection

Bookmark and Share
NEW DELHI: A team of lawyers who were conducting an inspection at the Delhi government's overcrowded Asha Kiran Home at 7.30am on Saturday. Half way into the inspection approved by the Delhi high court, the staff on duty at the home for mentally challenged allegedly refused to let the lawyers out, insisting that they had orders that the team must wait for senior officials in charge of the home.

When the team was locked inside the home they called the police and an FIR was lodged.

For more information read: Times of India ,
                                              Indian Express

Contact: Advocate Anant Asthana and Advocate Pankaj Sinha : Litigation.delhi@hrln.org and Seema Baquer on dri.delhi@hrln.org

Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit

Delhi High Court Issues Historic Guidelines to eliminate incarceration of children in Jails

Bookmark and Share

In response to a letter petition by HRLN Lawyer Anant Asthana alleging that juveniles are being shown as adults and are being incarcerated into Jails and subsequent discovery of hundreds of juveniles in Tihar Jail in the survey done by teams constituted by National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, Delhi High Court has issued comprehensive directions to eliminate incarceration of children into jails.
Some of the salient features of these historic guidelines are detailed below:
Age Memo: On the line of “Arrest Memo” which was evolved on the direction of Supreme Court in order to curb illegal detention at police stations, Delhi High Court has directed Police to incorporate “Age Memo” in criminal investigations. Copies of such age memos have to be immediately supplied to accused, his/her family and officials of Legal Services Authority.
Inquiry and Action against Police in case of lapse: In each case of lapse, Deputy Commissioner of Police shall conduct inquiry and action shall also be taken against the erring police officials.
Mandatory Legal Aid: Court has also issued detailed guidelines to Juvenile Justice Boards to ensure that not a single child goes unrepresented by a legal aid lawyer and has set in details as to how effective and meaningful legal aid has to be provided to juveniles. Official of District Legal Services Authorities have been given responsibility to act as a check on police officials with a view to ensure that they don’t produce persons below the age of 18 years in adult criminal courts.
In pursuance of this Judgment, hundreds of persons incarcerated in Jails of Delhi are now being produced before Juvenile Justice Boards and Courts which are conducting age inquiries of such inmates. Among those who have been incarcerated in Jails is a person who has served 14 years in Jail already and another one is who was sentenced to death. Both of them have now been declared juveniles and have been set at liberty. These guidelines have been issued by Division Bench of Hon’ble Delhi High Court comprising of Acting Chief Justice A.K. Sikri and Justice Rajiv Sahay Endlaw in Writ Petition (Civil) 8889 of 2011.
For background details, click here:

Read the Delhi High Court Judgment for further details of these historic guidelines on our website (www.hrln.org)

For further details, Contact:
Advocate Anant Kumar Asthana
Mobile: 92 12 11 71 05

Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit

HRLN gets protection for a newly married girl harrased by her family for asserting her right to choice.

Bookmark and Share

11.04.2012, Delhi

In yet another case of a young girl being harrased by her family members for asserting her right to choice. In a case filed before the High Court of Delhi, the court orders Delhi Police for her protection.

The well educated girl who fled from Uttar Pradesh because her family was against her getting married to the person of her choice. She married this February against the wishes of her family, after which she and her partner were constantly threatened. The girl on false promise of social marriage was asked to return home . Her husband was later beaten by her brother and threatned to be implicated in false cases of kidnapping and abduction. The girl was also tortured and beaten up her family members. She was also verbally abused by the U.P. police once she returned home. The boy who is currently pursuing his studies abroad had to leave the country.

When the matter came to notice of HRLN, an urgent petition was filed in the court for protection of the young girl . The case was admitted as Writ Petition (Criminal) 1532 of 2012. Hon’ble High Court asked the respondents to file the reply and for the meantime, directed Delhi Police to ensure safety and protection of the girl while her stay in Delhi. This direction has been communicated to the concerned authorities by HRLN and the girl is now residing safely and securely in Delhi.

Harrasment of young couples who assert their right to choice is common in India. Not only family but also society and police are involved in this. In most of these cases the boy and his family are falsely booked for kidnapping. The police is an equal party and spare no chance in harassing the young couples. Once the couples return back to their homes they face physical abuse and torture by their family members. Their movement is restricted and they are locked inside their own house. Their documents are taken away and in few cases forcefully married again against their wishes. There is a strong need for strict laws to curb these crimes against the young couples who assert their right to choice.


For further details, please Contact


                                      Advocate Monica Joshi, 09911667995
                                    Advocate Anuj Castelino , 09650760842
Advocate Svetlana Correya, 09953671306

Smriti Minocha , 09811434363


Human Rights Law Network , Delhi
 

Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit

Supreme Court issues notices to Union of India, Director General Civil Aviation and Spice Jet Ltd.

Bookmark and Share



Notices were issued on 04 April 2012 in WP(C) 98 of 2012, on the basis of a writ petition filed by Ms Jeeja Ghosh, a person with cerebral palsy who was unceremoniously deplaned by Spice Jet in Kolkata on 19 Feb 2012. Despite being a regular air traveller and comfortably settled in her seat on her way to a conference on disability rights in Goa, Ms Jeeja Gosh was deemed unfit to fly by the air crew and removed before take-off. The conference, North South Dialogue IV, was organized by Dr Mithu Alur, founder of Able Disable All People Together (ADAPT), the second petitioner in the case.

Despite the existing Constitutional, domestic and international laws on the issue, Ms Jeeja Ghosh and others in her situation continue to face discrimination and harassment while travelling. These acts, occurring on various airlines across the country, are in violation of the existing Civil Aviation Requirements, and also violate the Persons With Disabilities Act, 1995.The actions are also directly contrary to the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), which India ratified in 2007.

In addition to compensation for the loss and suffering that resulted from this particular incident the Petitioner is also seeking direction to ensure that the Respondents take action to ensure implementation of the Civil Aviation Requirements and other statutory and constitutional requirements, with clearly spelt out exemplary penalties for non-compliance with the regulations to ensure that such behaviour does not occur in the future.



For further information please contact:
Douglas Wyatt


+91-81300-80472
doug.hrln@gmail.com

Rajive raturi m: 9818628760 rajive.raturi@hrln.org

Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit

Supreme Court Issues Notices in Public Interest Litigation Regarding Unsafe and Unethical Sterilizations

Bookmark and Share
2 April 2012

DELHI- Senior Counsel Colin Gonsalves appeared before the Supreme Court in  Devika Biswas vs. Union of India and Ors. (W.P. (C) 81 of 2012), and the Court was pleased to issue notices to the Centre and every state in this Public Interest Litigation filed by the Human Rights Law Network. 

Petitioner and health rights activist Devika Biswas revealed the gruesome details of a January 2012 sterilization camp at the Kaparfora Government Middle School, Araria District in a February 2012 fact-finding report. With the explicit permission of the State Health Society,an NGO and a private doctor used the government middle school as an operating theater for at least 53 sterilization surgeries on poor, dalit, and scheduled caste women. In clear violation of Government guidelines and basic human rights, the doctor performed the surgeries at night, under torchlight. During the two hours he was operating, the doctor did not wash his hands, change gloves, or wear a surgical gown and cap. After their surgeries, untrained NGO workers placed the women on straw paddy provided by the families. The doctor operated on one pregnant woman, Jitni Devi, who miscarried days after her surgery. The doctor and NGO staff left three women profusely bleeding, including Saraswati Devi, who spent 8 days recovering in the hospital. Most of the women from the camp have had to seek costly private care. None of the women were counseled. 

The horrific human rights violations extend beyond these events in Bihar. Doctors and health facilities across the county routinely flaunt the ethical and procedural guidelines prescribed by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Constitutional obligations, and international norms. The Public Interest Litigation specifically outlines examples of coerced and unsafe sterilizations in Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan.   

This Public Interest Litigation sets forth the urgent need for an independent organization like the National Alliance for Maternal Health and Human Rights to investigate nationwide compliance with national guidelines, for all states to obtain informed consent as per National Guidelines, for all states to file status reports on compliance with the Supreme Court’s directions in Ramakant Rai (W.P. 209/2003) and the National Guidelines, and for compensation for the victims.
About the Petitioner: Devika Biswas has been working as a health rights activist with the Bihar Voluntary Health Association since 1989. She has published articles on the two-child norm in the book, Empowerment and Coercion, and on the conditions of health scenario from citizens’ perspective (published by the Centre for Health and Social Justice, New Delhi). In 2011, the Petitioner carried out a Rapid Assessment of the Health Programme in Bihar (forthcoming publication by CHSJ in Collaboration with SRM University, Chennai, UNFPA, ND). After  a fact-finding mission on in her native district of Araria, Ms. Biswas felt compelled to file this petition to ensure that sterilizations nation-wide are conducted as per the legal norms and to see that the victims in Bihar receive compensation for their injuries.

Feel free to contact HRLN if you would like a copy of the petition. 
The Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) is a collective of lawyers and social activists dedicated to the use of the legal system to advance human rights in India and the sub-continent. To learn more visit hrln.org.
Kerry McBroom
Director, Reproductive Rights Unit
Human Rights Law Network
Mob:  9650316596    
Email: kmcbroom.hrln@gmail.com

Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit

Delhi HC issues order for release of Tibetan protesters

Bookmark and Share

Delhi High Court tells Delhi Police to stop unnecessary harassment and unwarranted interrogations in wake of Tibetan Protests, Government assures immediate release of all arrested/ detained Tibetans



29.03.2012/ New Delhi
During the recent visit of Chinese Premier to New Delhi for BRICS Summit on 29/29.03.12, Delhi Police unleashed panic and caused harassment of Tibetans and Indians from North East India, who resembles like Tibetans and subjected several people to unwarranted interrogations. Around 200 Tibetans were sent behind the bars on mere suspicion. Lawyers from HRLN were flooded with requests for help and when these lawyers tried to get in touch with the detained Tibetans, police stations denied access and refused to share any information about charges.
On 29.03.12, Acting Chief Justice Arjun Sikri of Hon’ble Delhi High Court was informed about such indiscriminate action of police by way of oral mentioning in the open Court and Counsel for Delhi Police was immediately called to answer the complaint. Lawyers from HRLN, Advocate Svetlana Sandra Correya and Advocate Tsering C. who had themselves faced difficulty in extending legal assistance to arrested persons and had faced unnecessary interrogation at the hand of police also appeared before Hon’ble High Court and narrated their experiences.
Keeping in view the urgency and on the assurance that all 198 arrested/ detained Tibetans will be released on 30.02.12 latest by 10:45 AM, Hon’ble High Court passed an order, observing that:
No doubt, the police and other authorities including FRRO, as and when suspect any law and order situation, are entitled to take remedial/ preventive measures. At the same time it is also the duty of the police not to put anybody to unnecessary harassment and unwarranted interrogations. The aforesaid order is in respect of 197 Tibetans and other Tibetans; therefore persons from North East or Ladakh cannot be subjected to any interrogation / detention pursuant thereto.
On the request of Lawyers, Hon’ble Court has also granted liberty to present a Petition to ensure that these kinds of incidents are not repeated in future. Commenting on this development, Sethu Das, President of prominent Tibet Support Group “Friends of Tibet” has said:
“We thank entire team of lawyers for taking this issue to a very logical conclusion. This unique court order will also have a lasting impact on all political activities in future by the exile community members.
Soon a comprehensive petition will be presented before Hon’ble Court seeking remedies against re-occurrence of such violations in future.
For further details, Please contact:
Advocate Anant Asthana
Human Rights Law Network
Email: anant.asthana@hrln.org/ litigation.delhi@hrln.org

Read the full order here

Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit

Court issues notices to 57 in Mirchpur murder case

Bookmark and Share
Respondents asked to file replies to appeals by March 27.
The Delhi High Court on Friday issued notices to 57 people on a bunch of appeals by victims of the Mirchpur caste violence case in which two persons were killed and 18 houses of the Dalit community were burnt in the village in Hisar district of Haryana in 2010.
A Division Bench comprising Justices S.P. Garg and S. Ravindra Bhat asked the respondents to file replies to the appeals by March 27.
Appellants Kamla, wife of deceased Tarachand, her son and three others through their lawyers, Anubha Rastogi and Shreeji Bhavsar (HRLN Lawyers), have sought enhancement of punishment for the 12 accused and conviction of the three accused who were awarded life imprisonment under the Scheduled Castes\Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act under Section 302 (murder) of the Indian Penal Code as well. The trial court had held a total of 15 accused guilty in the case.
The appellants have also sought conviction of the 82 persons acquitted by the trial court for want of credible evidence. However, the Bench issued notices only to 42 of them saying the prosecution had not produced sufficient evidence against rest.
Fifteen other notices were issued to those held guilty by the trial court.
The Special Judge of a designated Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes court here, Kamini Lau, had convicted the three accused for culpable homicide not amounting to murder for setting fire to the house of Tarachand and Suman in which they had taken refuge. They lost their life in the attack. Six persons were held guilty for setting other Dalit houses on fire and six others for unlawful assembly and stone throwing.
However, Ms. Lau acquitted them of the charges of murder, rioting, looting, and criminal conspiracy saying the prosecution had failed to establish the charges against them beyond reasonable doubt.
The Special Court had also acquitted Narnaud Police Station House Officer Vinod Kumar Kajal, one of the accused in the case, for allegedly exhorting the mob to burn Dalit homes before police reinforcements arrived and for alleged negligence of duties under the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes Act, saying the charges against him could not be proved.
The case had come to Delhi on a direction by the Supreme Court on a petition filed by the victims expressing apprehensions that the trial would not be fair in Haryana as the environment there was not conducive.
·  Two persons were killed, 18 Dalit houses set on fire in Haryana's Mirchpur village in 2010
·  Appellants seek enhancement of punishment for 12 accused

As reported by Hindu on 25/2/2012

Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit
Bookmark and Share
The High Court of Madhya Pradesh has passed a landmark final judgment in the case of Sandesh Bansal v. Union of India (PIL) W.P. 9061/2008, recognizing that a woman’s right to survive pregnancy and childbirth is a fundamental right protected under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.  Filed in 2008 by Sandesh Bansal, a health activist and member of the Jan Adhikaar Manch, as part of Human Rights Law Network’s national strategy to use litigation as a means of addressing India’s high maternal mortality & morbidity, the case sought accountability for the government's failure to respect, protect, and fulfill the rights of pregnant women. Advocate Jayshree Satpute, who argued the final hearings in the matter noted the judgment as a  "a significant step forward for women's health in India, as a growing number of High Courts have begun to recognize reproductive rights as fundamental rights and order life-saving reliefs."
 
Madhya Pradesh is the India's third most populous state, and as noted by the Honorable Court "afflicted with the worst indicators in India" such as high rates of illiteracy, mortality, morbidity and people living below the poverty line. Poor socio-economic conditions persist despite enactment of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), a public health scheme funded by the Central Government to address India’s shockingly high maternal and infant mortality in furtherance of its public health duties as provided by the Indian Constitution and international human rights law. Relying upon extensive government research and reports, such as the State Programme Implementation Plan, Common Review Mission, and a Registrar's report submitted during the pendency of the litigation, the Court documented the failure of the government to implement the NRHM, noting dilapidated facility conditions, non-availability of skilled personnel, essential medicines, and access to timely and consistent matenal health services. The Court further rejected the government's claim that financial constraints served as a barrier to full implementation, noting that over 17100 lakhs remained unspent at the end of 2009.
 
As the Court eloquently explained,  
 
" 22. (…) we observe from the material on record that there is shortage not only of the infrastructure but of the man power also which has adversely affected the effective implementation of the [National Rural Health Mission]  which is turn is costing the life of mothers in the course of mothering. It be remembered that the inability of women to survive pregnancy and child birth violates her fundamental rights as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. And it is primary duty of the government to ensure that every women survives pregnancy and child birth, for that, the State of Madhya Pradesh is under obligation to secure their life.
 
In recognition of the fundamental nature of these rights, the Court ordered immediate implementation of the NRHM, with a focus on strengthening infrastructure, providing access to timely maternal health services, skilled personnel, effective referral and grievance redressal mechanisms. A timebound plan for “strict and timely” implementation was ordered consistent with NRHM, with the Court setting specific directives, such as:
 
• 24 hours availability of trained woman as ASHA/Community health worker
• Two staff nurses at the primary health centre to ensure round the clock service therein
• Three staff nurses at the primary health centres to ensure round the clock serrvice therein.
• Uninterrupted electricity supply and the water supply to the sub-centres and public health centres.
• Ensure proper modern sanitation.
• Ensure that in all 227 Community Health Centres in the State of Madhya Pradesh the availability of 24 hours delivery services including normal and assisted deliveries it has 30-35 beds. To be equipped with man and machine at par with the Indian Public Heatlh standards, which would include Essential and Emergency Obestric Care Unit, so that round the clock hospital like services are available.
• Ensure availability of vehicle round the clock under Janani Express Yojana.
• Ensure that every pregnant women and new born is vaccinated with Tetanus, BCG, Polio, DPT
• To set-up all 87 Rogi Kalyan Samitis
• Constitute monitoring committee at District Block level and ensure complete documentation of each and every patient.
 
Please see detailed judgment here
 
 
The Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) is a collective of lawyers and social activists dedicated to the use of the legal system to advance human rights in India and the sub-continent. To learn more visit hrln.org.

Contact:
Advocate Jayshree Satpute
Mob: 987155098
jsatpute@gmail.com
 
Or
 
Advocate Anubhav Jain
9425152501
Jayshree Satpute
Advocate

Mobile: +91 (0)9871155098
E-mail: jsatpute@gmail.com
Website: www.nazdeek.org

Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit

HRLN intervenes to secure protection for newly married couple, Delhi High Court directs Delhi Police to safeguard the couple

Bookmark and Share



04.01.2012/ Delhi
Incidents of harassment of young boys and girls for exercising their right to choice in marriage are quite routine in India. Boys generally face criminal cases against them for kidnapping the girls, while girls face humiliation and harassment by the parents and society, leaving the couple with no option except to elope or hide or sometime even committing suicide.

One such case of a couple from Uttar Pradesh (UP) who fled to Delhi was brought to the notice of HRLN Social Worker on 02.01.12 in the evening. Couple informed that both of them were adults and had married as they were in love and had to flee to Delhi as they were being harassed by parents of the girl and Uttar Pradesh Police. Couple informed that a FIR for kidnapping the girl was lodged in UP against the boy and his family and some police personnel were raiding places in Delhi to catch the boy and his family.

Two HRLN lawyers immediately took up the matter, drafted the petition in the night itself and filed it in Delhi High Court the very next morning praying for protection of the couple. Case was admitted as Writ Petition (Criminal) 12 of 2012. Hon’ble High Court asked the respondents to file the reply and for the meantime, directed Delhi Police to ensure safety and protection of the couple while their stay in Delhi. This direction has been communicated to the concerned authorities by HRLN and the couple is now residing safely and securely in Delhi.




For further details, please Contact: 
Smriti Minocha , 09811434363
Advcate Anuj Castelino , 09650760842
Advocate Monica Joshi, 09911667995
Email: wji.delhi@hrln.org / litigation.delhi@hrln.org
Human Rights Law Network , Delhi

Add To Facebook Add To Yahoo Stumble This Fav This With Technorati Add To Del.icio.us Digg This Add To Reddit