The High Court of Madhya Pradesh has passed a 
landmark final judgment in the case of Sandesh Bansal v. Union of 
India (PIL) W.P. 9061/2008, recognizing that a woman’s right to 
survive pregnancy and childbirth is a fundamental right protected under 
Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.  Filed in 2008 by Sandesh Bansal,
 a health activist and member of the Jan Adhikaar Manch, as part of 
Human Rights Law Network’s national strategy to use litigation as a 
means of addressing India’s high maternal mortality & morbidity, the
 case sought accountability for the government's failure to respect, 
protect, and fulfill the rights of pregnant women. Advocate Jayshree 
Satpute, who argued the final hearings in the matter noted the judgment 
as a  "a significant step forward for women's health in India, as a 
growing number of High Courts have begun to recognize reproductive 
rights as fundamental rights and order life-saving reliefs."
 
Madhya Pradesh is 
the India's third most populous state, and as noted by the Honorable 
Court "afflicted with the worst indicators in India" such as high rates 
of illiteracy, mortality, morbidity and people living below the 
poverty line. Poor socio-economic conditions persist despite enactment 
of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), a public health scheme 
funded by the Central Government to address India’s shockingly high 
maternal and infant mortality in furtherance of its public health duties
 as provided by the Indian Constitution and international human rights 
law. Relying upon extensive government research and reports, such as the
 State Programme Implementation Plan, Common Review Mission, and 
a Registrar's report submitted during the pendency of the litigation, 
the Court documented the failure of the government to implement the 
NRHM, noting dilapidated facility conditions, non-availability of 
skilled personnel, essential medicines, and access to timely and 
consistent matenal health services. The Court further rejected the 
government's claim that financial constraints served as a barrier to 
full implementation, noting that over 17100 lakhs remained unspent at 
the end of 2009.
 
As the Court eloquently explained,  
 
"
 22. (…) we observe from the material on record that there is shortage 
not only of the infrastructure but of the man power also which has 
adversely affected the effective implementation of the [National Rural 
Health Mission]  which is turn is costing the life of mothers in the 
course of mothering. It be remembered that the inability of women to 
survive pregnancy and child birth violates her fundamental rights as 
guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. And it is 
primary duty of the government to ensure that every women survives 
pregnancy and child birth, for that, the State of Madhya Pradesh is 
under obligation to secure their life.
 
In recognition of the fundamental nature of these 
rights, the Court ordered immediate implementation of the NRHM, with 
a focus on strengthening infrastructure, providing access to timely 
maternal health services, skilled personnel, effective referral and 
grievance redressal mechanisms. A timebound plan for “strict and timely”
 implementation was ordered consistent with NRHM, with the Court setting
 specific directives, such as:
 
• 24 hours availability of trained woman as 
ASHA/Community health worker
• Two staff nurses at the primary
 health centre to ensure round the clock service therein
• 
Three staff nurses at the primary health centres to ensure round the 
clock serrvice therein.
• Uninterrupted electricity supply and the water supply to the 
sub-centres and public health centres.
• Ensure proper modern 
sanitation.
• Ensure that in all 227 Community Health Centres 
in the State of Madhya Pradesh the availability of 24 hours delivery 
services including normal and assisted deliveries it has 30-35 beds. To 
be equipped with man and machine at par with the Indian Public Heatlh 
standards, which would include Essential and Emergency Obestric Care 
Unit, so that round the clock hospital like services are available.
• Ensure availability of vehicle round the clock under Janani 
Express Yojana.
• Ensure that every pregnant women and new 
born is vaccinated with Tetanus, BCG, Polio, DPT
• To set-up 
all 87 Rogi Kalyan Samitis
• Constitute monitoring committee at District Block level and 
ensure complete documentation of each and every patient.
 
Please see detailed judgment 
here  
 
 
The Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) is a collective of lawyers 
and social activists dedicated to the use of the legal system to advance
 human rights in India and the sub-continent. To learn more visit hrln.org. 
 
Or
 
Advocate Anubhav Jain